Skip to main content

Abstract: Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet

 Dr Anastasia Meintani, Universität Wien

Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet

This paper examines the display of deformed people in the Hellenistic and Roman periods in the context of the banquet on two grounds: archaeological finds and literary sources. Though both sources have inherent problems, they are still invaluable in that they both refer to the same context.

As far as the archaeological finds are concerned, legions of small-scale grotesque figurines were produced in the Hellenistic and Roman periods. A great number of them found their place in the banqueting room. Contra to all propounded theories, whose underlying common denominator is that the purpose of these images was the lampoon and degradation of the dregs of society and of the physically deformed, I argue that such statuettes carried deeply positive meanings.

Turning to the living counterparts of these artefacts, we should keep in mind that besides the cases of the Roman emperors and wealthy Romans having deformed individuals in their households, a number of them made their living as ‘professional’ entertainers (as dancers and musicians) on festive occasions. They belonged to troupes that were hired under contracts. But even in the former cases, a number of passages reveal that some of them enjoyed a privileged treatment as confidants of emperors or as favourites of the elite. What is more, other extracts point to the immunity of the jesters even when their scathing comments were directed at an emperor or at banqueters of high status.

True, ancient texts were not written by people with impairments and disabilities. As such, they do not provide us with a first-person perspective. More than that, in many instances authors bend the truth for their own ends. There are many conventions in play and we have to be on our guard. Nevertheless, the baby should not be thrown out with the bathwater. Far from disparaging them as unreliable, we have to read these sources from various angles and with caution.

All in all, this paper does not suggest that people with disabilities were treated with the outmost reverence and led felicitous lives in the Graeco-Roman antiquity. This would be a foolhardy conclusion. However, it does point to a more nuanced examination rather than perpetuating the sweeping generalization that those with physical defects were loathed and scathed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conference Programme

Programme 09:00 - 09:15 Welcome and intro Dr Jane Draycott, University of Glasgow 09:15-10:15 Keynote Prof Adrienne Mayor, Stanford University 10:15-11:15 Panel 1: Metamorphosis of Bodies Dr Tanika Koosmen, University of Newcastle, Australia [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as “Display” of Form Dr Ryan Denson, University of Exeter: Pickled Tritons: The Bodily Display of (Divine) Cryptids in the Roman Empire COFFEE BREAK 11:15 – 11:30 11:30 - 12:30 Panel 2: First Impressions/Judgement of Bodies Jasmine Sahu-Hough, PhD candidate - Yale University: “The Sort of Man You All See Me To Be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens Dr Dan Mills, Georgia Institute of Technology: Physiognomic Disability in Literary, Statuarial, and Numismatic Depictions of Claudius 12:30 - 13:30 Panel 3: Bodies of Servants Dr Anastasia Meintani, Universität Wien: Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet Shreya Sharma, Independent Scholar: Visual Arts and British Impe
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract (keynote speaker): Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons

  Prof. Adrienne Mayor. Stanford University. Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons  Motives for and responses to displays of extraordinary bodies in antiquity trace a continuum.   Bodily otherness could elicit negative feelings of disgust and superiority, at one end of the spectrum, and at the other end a sense of wonder and compassion. Motivations could include sensational entertainment, curiosity, domination, and scientific interest. To illustrate the complex diversity of intentions and reactions, my talk looks at how artistic images, literary descriptions, and public exhibits of mythic creatures (Centaurs, Griffins, and the Minotaur); wild animals captured for the Roman arena; anomalous and enslaved humans; and Amazons and female warriors in captivity aroused a range of emotions in viewers. Ancient Greek and Roman artists evoked empathy for hybrid monsters by focusing on their human features and/or their familiar, endearing animal behaviors. Unlike the Greeks, the Romans prefer
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract: DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA

  Natalia Fernández Díaz-Cabal, Ph.D. Autonomous University of Barcelona and University of Shanghai DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA   Despite its "insignificance" from the point of view of its social and cultural impact, sarcoma, throughout its history as an identified and identifiable clinical entity, shows some curiosities that we would like to deal with: its visibility from the monstrous (the dimensions of a sarcoma can be of a remarkable enormity compared to other malignant tumors) to the invisibility of the term itself (sarcoma evokes bitter destinies and especially since the irruption of AIDS - Kaposi's sarcoma - gives it a definitive deadly connotation). This displaying or exhibiting objectifies the patient - the principle that the patient is only his/her illness applies. The human subject is not of interest; only his/her exceptionality and stigma do. In order to understand the meaning of what is displayed, it is necessary to delve into
Post a Comment
Read more