Skip to main content

Abstract: Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet

 Dr Anastasia Meintani, Universität Wien

Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet

This paper examines the display of deformed people in the Hellenistic and Roman periods in the context of the banquet on two grounds: archaeological finds and literary sources. Though both sources have inherent problems, they are still invaluable in that they both refer to the same context.

As far as the archaeological finds are concerned, legions of small-scale grotesque figurines were produced in the Hellenistic and Roman periods. A great number of them found their place in the banqueting room. Contra to all propounded theories, whose underlying common denominator is that the purpose of these images was the lampoon and degradation of the dregs of society and of the physically deformed, I argue that such statuettes carried deeply positive meanings.

Turning to the living counterparts of these artefacts, we should keep in mind that besides the cases of the Roman emperors and wealthy Romans having deformed individuals in their households, a number of them made their living as ‘professional’ entertainers (as dancers and musicians) on festive occasions. They belonged to troupes that were hired under contracts. But even in the former cases, a number of passages reveal that some of them enjoyed a privileged treatment as confidants of emperors or as favourites of the elite. What is more, other extracts point to the immunity of the jesters even when their scathing comments were directed at an emperor or at banqueters of high status.

True, ancient texts were not written by people with impairments and disabilities. As such, they do not provide us with a first-person perspective. More than that, in many instances authors bend the truth for their own ends. There are many conventions in play and we have to be on our guard. Nevertheless, the baby should not be thrown out with the bathwater. Far from disparaging them as unreliable, we have to read these sources from various angles and with caution.

All in all, this paper does not suggest that people with disabilities were treated with the outmost reverence and led felicitous lives in the Graeco-Roman antiquity. This would be a foolhardy conclusion. However, it does point to a more nuanced examination rather than perpetuating the sweeping generalization that those with physical defects were loathed and scathed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Abstract: [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as ‘Display’ of Form

  [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as ‘Display’ of Form Dr Tanika Koosmen University of Newcastle, Australia. tanika.koosmen@newcastle.edu.au The historical narrative of displayed bodies in a variety of contexts – freak shows, museum display of human remains, even as far as drag shows – finds its philosophical origins in the traditions of Greco-Roman mythological metamorphosis. To display a body is to be aware of its physicality, its metaphorical makeup, and its human/nonhuman subjectivity. In the Greek and Latin myths of transformation, exemplified by 1 st century CE Latin poet Ovid’s Metamorphoses , the display of the human and nonhuman form pre-empts the approach validated in later display traditions. When displaying a body that traverses the line between human and nonhuman, object and subject, these categorical violations must be considered: display of the metamorphosised form in literature is the early origins of these discussions, such as the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Call for Papers

An increasing amount of attention has been paid to impairment and disability in classical antiquity in recent years. However, one aspect of the subject that has not received significant attention, despite recent developments in the study of ancient paradoxography (e.g., Kazantzidis 2019; Geus 2018) and ancient collections, collectors, and collecting (e.g., Carpino et al. 2018; Higbie 2017; Thompson 2016; Gahtan and Pegazzano 2015; Rutledge 2012), is the public display of impaired and disabled people. The same applies to extraordinary (in all senses of the word) bodies. Whether those bodies were human, animal, or cryptid, when scholars have acknowledged this phenomenon, the focus has been placed squarely on those individuals responsible for the displaying. For example, the imperial biographer Suetonius uses this as an indicator of virtue or vice in his subjects: Augustus is a good emperor for avoiding bodily display while Tiberius and Domitian are bad emperors for indulging in the pr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract: “The sort of man you all see me to be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens

Jasmine Sahu-Hough  PhD candidate, Yale University   “The sort of man you all see me to be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens   The dokimasia held annually to assess the eligibility of Athenian citizens for the so-called ‘disability pension’ would seem, in many ways, to be a classic example of the public display of disabled bodies. In requiring the recipients of the pension to submit to examination, the ancient Athenian democracy appears to prefigure modern states, which often subject those claiming disability benefits to intrusive surveillance – a process which, as Nancy Hirschmann and Beth Linker (2014) have argued, demotes disabled citizens to the status of “dependents”. Matthew Dillion (2017), however, has demonstrated that the dokimasia was simply a standard feature of democratic fiscal oversight; not only the pension beneficiaries (the adunatoi), but ...
Post a Comment
Read more