Skip to main content

Abstract: Vexed paradox in historic anatomical display – one artist-researcher’s perspective through lived experience

Sarah Scaife, PhD candidate - University of Exeter 

Vexed paradox in historic anatomical display – one artist-researcher’s perspective through lived experience 

In this paper I push at the question of “how extraordinary individuals […] themselves felt about being displayed”. As a one-breasted researcher, may I propose that we look at this question sideways on? This paper responds to historic wax anatomy models displayed in several European museum collections, in the light of my own lived experience of the challenges and benefits of cancer treatment. Anatomical models of human bodies and body parts, made in the name of scientific progress in 18th and 19th century Europe, have grisly underpinnings. Such wax models were at the forefront of research medicine which ultimately benefited many people, but they have a vexed history. Scientific models of an idealised anatomy were created from a composite of multiple human bodies; these bodies were routinely procured in the context of enforced marginalisation or even retribution. Thus, medical knowledge is extracted from the bodies of those who gave no consent. (Reilly, 2021). Today, artists are well placed to look into some of the complex and difficult tensions embedded in historical and contemporary health systems (e.g. Confabulations programme 2021-23). As an artist and practice-based researcher I encountered these life-sized wax anatomical models close-up, through an on-line drawing workshop series in lockdown (Performing Medicine, 2021). My enquiry raised vexed paradoxes inherent in the receiving of life-saving medical treatment as a modern patient, which is based on historic violations of personhood. Making drawings from the models displayed, this time on-screen, offered a means to work with the intense discomfort this brought up. I came to discover unexpected resonance with my own lived experience of cancer treatment. This transdisciplinary paper is situated within practice-based artistic performance scholarship and draws upon art history, Museum Studies and the Medical Humanities.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conference Programme

Programme 09:00 - 09:15 Welcome and intro Dr Jane Draycott, University of Glasgow 09:15-10:15 Keynote Prof Adrienne Mayor, Stanford University 10:15-11:15 Panel 1: Metamorphosis of Bodies Dr Tanika Koosmen, University of Newcastle, Australia [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as “Display” of Form Dr Ryan Denson, University of Exeter: Pickled Tritons: The Bodily Display of (Divine) Cryptids in the Roman Empire COFFEE BREAK 11:15 – 11:30 11:30 - 12:30 Panel 2: First Impressions/Judgement of Bodies Jasmine Sahu-Hough, PhD candidate - Yale University: “The Sort of Man You All See Me To Be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens Dr Dan Mills, Georgia Institute of Technology: Physiognomic Disability in Literary, Statuarial, and Numismatic Depictions of Claudius 12:30 - 13:30 Panel 3: Bodies of Servants Dr Anastasia Meintani, Universität Wien: Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet Shreya Sharma, Independent Scholar: Visual Arts and British Impe
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract (keynote speaker): Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons

  Prof. Adrienne Mayor. Stanford University. Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons  Motives for and responses to displays of extraordinary bodies in antiquity trace a continuum.   Bodily otherness could elicit negative feelings of disgust and superiority, at one end of the spectrum, and at the other end a sense of wonder and compassion. Motivations could include sensational entertainment, curiosity, domination, and scientific interest. To illustrate the complex diversity of intentions and reactions, my talk looks at how artistic images, literary descriptions, and public exhibits of mythic creatures (Centaurs, Griffins, and the Minotaur); wild animals captured for the Roman arena; anomalous and enslaved humans; and Amazons and female warriors in captivity aroused a range of emotions in viewers. Ancient Greek and Roman artists evoked empathy for hybrid monsters by focusing on their human features and/or their familiar, endearing animal behaviors. Unlike the Greeks, the Romans prefer
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract: DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA

  Natalia Fernández Díaz-Cabal, Ph.D. Autonomous University of Barcelona and University of Shanghai DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA   Despite its "insignificance" from the point of view of its social and cultural impact, sarcoma, throughout its history as an identified and identifiable clinical entity, shows some curiosities that we would like to deal with: its visibility from the monstrous (the dimensions of a sarcoma can be of a remarkable enormity compared to other malignant tumors) to the invisibility of the term itself (sarcoma evokes bitter destinies and especially since the irruption of AIDS - Kaposi's sarcoma - gives it a definitive deadly connotation). This displaying or exhibiting objectifies the patient - the principle that the patient is only his/her illness applies. The human subject is not of interest; only his/her exceptionality and stigma do. In order to understand the meaning of what is displayed, it is necessary to delve into
Post a Comment
Read more