Skip to main content

Abstract: Vexed paradox in historic anatomical display – one artist-researcher’s perspective through lived experience

Sarah Scaife, PhD candidate - University of Exeter 

Vexed paradox in historic anatomical display – one artist-researcher’s perspective through lived experience 

In this paper I push at the question of “how extraordinary individuals […] themselves felt about being displayed”. As a one-breasted researcher, may I propose that we look at this question sideways on? This paper responds to historic wax anatomy models displayed in several European museum collections, in the light of my own lived experience of the challenges and benefits of cancer treatment. Anatomical models of human bodies and body parts, made in the name of scientific progress in 18th and 19th century Europe, have grisly underpinnings. Such wax models were at the forefront of research medicine which ultimately benefited many people, but they have a vexed history. Scientific models of an idealised anatomy were created from a composite of multiple human bodies; these bodies were routinely procured in the context of enforced marginalisation or even retribution. Thus, medical knowledge is extracted from the bodies of those who gave no consent. (Reilly, 2021). Today, artists are well placed to look into some of the complex and difficult tensions embedded in historical and contemporary health systems (e.g. Confabulations programme 2021-23). As an artist and practice-based researcher I encountered these life-sized wax anatomical models close-up, through an on-line drawing workshop series in lockdown (Performing Medicine, 2021). My enquiry raised vexed paradoxes inherent in the receiving of life-saving medical treatment as a modern patient, which is based on historic violations of personhood. Making drawings from the models displayed, this time on-screen, offered a means to work with the intense discomfort this brought up. I came to discover unexpected resonance with my own lived experience of cancer treatment. This transdisciplinary paper is situated within practice-based artistic performance scholarship and draws upon art history, Museum Studies and the Medical Humanities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Abstract: [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as ‘Display’ of Form

  [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as ‘Display’ of Form Dr Tanika Koosmen University of Newcastle, Australia. tanika.koosmen@newcastle.edu.au The historical narrative of displayed bodies in a variety of contexts – freak shows, museum display of human remains, even as far as drag shows – finds its philosophical origins in the traditions of Greco-Roman mythological metamorphosis. To display a body is to be aware of its physicality, its metaphorical makeup, and its human/nonhuman subjectivity. In the Greek and Latin myths of transformation, exemplified by 1 st century CE Latin poet Ovid’s Metamorphoses , the display of the human and nonhuman form pre-empts the approach validated in later display traditions. When displaying a body that traverses the line between human and nonhuman, object and subject, these categorical violations must be considered: display of the metamorphosised form in literature is the early origins of these discussions, such as the ...

Call for Papers

An increasing amount of attention has been paid to impairment and disability in classical antiquity in recent years. However, one aspect of the subject that has not received significant attention, despite recent developments in the study of ancient paradoxography (e.g., Kazantzidis 2019; Geus 2018) and ancient collections, collectors, and collecting (e.g., Carpino et al. 2018; Higbie 2017; Thompson 2016; Gahtan and Pegazzano 2015; Rutledge 2012), is the public display of impaired and disabled people. The same applies to extraordinary (in all senses of the word) bodies. Whether those bodies were human, animal, or cryptid, when scholars have acknowledged this phenomenon, the focus has been placed squarely on those individuals responsible for the displaying. For example, the imperial biographer Suetonius uses this as an indicator of virtue or vice in his subjects: Augustus is a good emperor for avoiding bodily display while Tiberius and Domitian are bad emperors for indulging in the pr...

Abstract: “The sort of man you all see me to be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens

Jasmine Sahu-Hough  PhD candidate, Yale University   “The sort of man you all see me to be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens   The dokimasia held annually to assess the eligibility of Athenian citizens for the so-called ‘disability pension’ would seem, in many ways, to be a classic example of the public display of disabled bodies. In requiring the recipients of the pension to submit to examination, the ancient Athenian democracy appears to prefigure modern states, which often subject those claiming disability benefits to intrusive surveillance – a process which, as Nancy Hirschmann and Beth Linker (2014) have argued, demotes disabled citizens to the status of “dependents”. Matthew Dillion (2017), however, has demonstrated that the dokimasia was simply a standard feature of democratic fiscal oversight; not only the pension beneficiaries (the adunatoi), but ...