Skip to main content

Abstract: Babies in Bottles: Personhood, Pregnancy, and Anatomical Preparations, 1880–1900

Prof. Jessica M. Dandona

Babies in Bottles: Personhood, Pregnancy, and Anatomical Preparations, 1880–1900  

At the end of the 19th century, the legal status of the anatomical specimen was slowly evolving into its modern form. Not yet regulated by specific legislation, specimens were the subject of rampant commodification and were exhibited, collected, traded, bought, and sold, internationally as well as locally. No meeting of an anatomical society was complete without their exposition—and no anatomical museum complete without their display. Focusing upon the exhibition of fetal remains, this paper demonstrates how the study of anatomical specimens mediated between the well-established, if still controversial, practice of dissection and an increasing emphasis on the visual as a privileged mode of encountering and describing the biomedical body. Through a consideration of the display of fetal bodies in both professional and popular contexts, including close analysis of 19th-century collections in Paris, Glasgow, and Philadelphia, this paper traces the shifting meanings, value, and significance attributed to anatomical preparations in this era. Linking fetal specimens to the medicalization of pregnancy, contemporary discoveries in embryology, and debates around abortion, I will argue that the emerging concept of fetal personhood challenged and inflected the ways in which specimens were understood, highlighting their hybrid—and thus “extraordinary”—quality as at once potential human subject and the object of knowledge. At a time when non-invasive, visual access to the interior of the pregnant body was not yet possible, moreover, the study and display of such specimens allowed both popular audiences and medical professionals to study the conditions, processes, and events that gave rise to fetal death and deformity. The fetal specimen thus functioned as an “extraordinary body” both in its paradoxical (in)visibility and through its role in marking, in the words of Rosemarie Garland Thomson, “the borders between the normal and the pathological.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conference Programme

Programme 09:00 - 09:15 Welcome and intro Dr Jane Draycott, University of Glasgow 09:15-10:15 Keynote Prof Adrienne Mayor, Stanford University 10:15-11:15 Panel 1: Metamorphosis of Bodies Dr Tanika Koosmen, University of Newcastle, Australia [Dis]Playing Changing Bodies: Metamorphic Greco-Roman Myths as “Display” of Form Dr Ryan Denson, University of Exeter: Pickled Tritons: The Bodily Display of (Divine) Cryptids in the Roman Empire COFFEE BREAK 11:15 – 11:30 11:30 - 12:30 Panel 2: First Impressions/Judgement of Bodies Jasmine Sahu-Hough, PhD candidate - Yale University: “The Sort of Man You All See Me To Be”: Visible Disability and Citizenship in Classical Athens Dr Dan Mills, Georgia Institute of Technology: Physiognomic Disability in Literary, Statuarial, and Numismatic Depictions of Claudius 12:30 - 13:30 Panel 3: Bodies of Servants Dr Anastasia Meintani, Universität Wien: Bodily Display in the Context of the Banquet Shreya Sharma, Independent Scholar: Visual Arts and British Impe
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract (keynote speaker): Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons

  Prof. Adrienne Mayor. Stanford University. Mythic Creatures and Captive Amazons  Motives for and responses to displays of extraordinary bodies in antiquity trace a continuum.   Bodily otherness could elicit negative feelings of disgust and superiority, at one end of the spectrum, and at the other end a sense of wonder and compassion. Motivations could include sensational entertainment, curiosity, domination, and scientific interest. To illustrate the complex diversity of intentions and reactions, my talk looks at how artistic images, literary descriptions, and public exhibits of mythic creatures (Centaurs, Griffins, and the Minotaur); wild animals captured for the Roman arena; anomalous and enslaved humans; and Amazons and female warriors in captivity aroused a range of emotions in viewers. Ancient Greek and Roman artists evoked empathy for hybrid monsters by focusing on their human features and/or their familiar, endearing animal behaviors. Unlike the Greeks, the Romans prefer
Post a Comment
Read more

Abstract: DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA

  Natalia Fernández Díaz-Cabal, Ph.D. Autonomous University of Barcelona and University of Shanghai DISPLAYING, HIDING: NARRATIVES AND IMAGES OF SARCOMA   Despite its "insignificance" from the point of view of its social and cultural impact, sarcoma, throughout its history as an identified and identifiable clinical entity, shows some curiosities that we would like to deal with: its visibility from the monstrous (the dimensions of a sarcoma can be of a remarkable enormity compared to other malignant tumors) to the invisibility of the term itself (sarcoma evokes bitter destinies and especially since the irruption of AIDS - Kaposi's sarcoma - gives it a definitive deadly connotation). This displaying or exhibiting objectifies the patient - the principle that the patient is only his/her illness applies. The human subject is not of interest; only his/her exceptionality and stigma do. In order to understand the meaning of what is displayed, it is necessary to delve into
Post a Comment
Read more